Form submitted successfully, thank you.

Error submitting form, please try again.

Validity Of Arbitration Agreement Case

This does not mean that all arbitration agreements reached before that date are necessarily at risk of being invalidated. According to the precedent set in 2013 by the Office of the High Commercial Court of Russia, “an arbitration agreement is considered valid until the opposing party presents admissible evidence of its invalidation.” This approach is in fact consistent with the principle pacta sunt servanda. Court decisions confirm a pro-arbitrating approach in Germany The higher regional courts in Munich and Karlsruhe were also expected to rule on the validity of arbitration clauses, which stipulated that an arbitral tribunal would have to rule on contract disputes. Both clauses explicitly exclude the jurisdiction of national courts. However, in both cases, the parties agreed to enter into a separate agreement setting, among other things, the rules relating to the constitution of the tribunal and the procedure. You have never made these separate agreements. Both courts upheld the arbitration clauses because the parties” intentions to be bound by arbitration could be clearly inferred from those clauses. In addition, the courts have decided that the constitution of the court or rules on procedure are not mandatory requirements of a compromise clause. If the parties do not agree on these requirements, the rules of delay of the German arbitration right apply, for example. B paragraphs 1035 or 1042 ZPO (OLG Munich, 6.8.2015, 34 Sch 3/15, BeckRS 2016, 4080); OLG Karlsruhe, 28.2.2012, NJOZ 2012, 809). b) As a general rule, the ability to arbitrate cannot be decided at sections 8 or 11 of the act, unless it is a clear case of dead wood. The compromise clause is read in dispute – translated into English and abbreviated – as follows: b) The formal validity of an international arbitration agreement must be determined according to the formal rules of validity of the right of arbitration of the country in which the arbitration is based. (a) The material validity of an international arbitration agreement must be determined in accordance with the law chosen by the parties to this agreement or, without specifying, according to the applicable law at the place (seat) of the arbitration procedure.